Category: Uncategorized

5x Debate Proposal Rules:

(Purpose – so that not only the participants would ‘ideally’ sharpen each other, but also untold others could review the high quality debate by internet for many years to come.)

Rule:

1. The topic be singular. (Single topic as much as possible.)
2. The one bringing the presupposition* (presenter) has the floor for the 1^st five minutes.
3. The opposition then has the floor for the 2^nd five minutes.
4. The third round the floor is reversed and the opposition goes first and has the floor for the 3rd five minutes.
5. The presenter then follows having the floor for the 4^th five minutes.
6. And the cycle repeated up to as many times as the two participants feel the need for, or have agreed to before the debate began. If both do not vote for additional time than was first agreed, both will then have ten minutes for a closing argument, of which is submitted without hearing the opponents closing arguments.
7. If any party believes he was misrepresented in the closing argument he can request a impartial board of three people to vote (by majority) for an additional five minutes for each party.

The respondent has 7 days to submit a response.

Responses can be sent by the following:

i. Audio,

1. Video,
2. Text that will then be converted to text/reader-audio*,

1. Tentatively we wish to keep debates on minor subject to 20 minutes, and difficult subject to only 60 minutes.
2. All x5 Debates will be available on line perpetually at no cost, with a topical search capacity.

text/reader-audio* – All participants will have access to load there text into a internet reader to assure that all words are accurately converted to the audio format. (We are making the final product in audio format because of its high demand in our society, simply put, people are much more likely to listen than reading.

The beauty of this process is the participants can call on as many resources they wish to give a well sourced, thought out, professional response.

Information used to support any position of any issue is strongly recommended that it be sourced in a texted addendum that will accompany the final product. (Simply reference a paragraph number during the presentment and observers can reference the source in their leisure.

Terms Defined:

presupposition* – noun – a thing tacitly assumed (presented) beforehand at the beginning of a line of argument or course of action.

text/reader-audio* –

CLICK > HERE – Possible debatable issues of interest.

The below is the shortened URL link to this page –

https://goo.gl/da16fP

(The underlined is added comments by Lawyer Hansen. 8-10-2018, the below is a letter sent to Hansen by Rivera.)

Hello Paul John Hansen:

State and federal laws may only tax income which is taxable. This means all corporate income may be made taxable because corporations are the product of state or federal law. 

The state (US) created the corporate entity, the state regulates/governs/taxes the business of ‘their’ corporate entity.

Individual income is only taxable when those individuals elect to declare it to be taxable by electing to making a state or federal income tax return and paying the tax on that return.

All association/business of a man with the United States is by consent (election).

States and the federal government create laws that appear to make corporations and individuals criminally liable if they do not file an income tax return. Take for example, the State of California Revenue & Taxation Code Section 19706, which only applies to corporations although it is commonly applied to individuals:

Revenue & Taxation Code Section 19706.  Any person or any officer or employee of any corporation who, within the time required by or under the provisions of this part, willfully fails to file any return or to supply any information with intent to evade any tax imposed by Part 10 (commencing with Section 17001 ) or Part 11 (commencing with Section 23001 ), or who, willfully and with like intent, makes, renders, signs, or verifies any false or fraudulent return or statement or supplies any false or fraudulent information, is punishable by imprisonment in the county jail not to exceed one year, or in the state prison, or by fine of not more than twenty thousand dollars ($20,000), or by both the fine and imprisonment, at the discretion of the court, together with the costs of investigation and prosecution.
 
Standard rules of statutory construction require that laws have but one subject.

The one given law must apply to only one class/type, either the class/type of corporation, or the class/type of ‘individual’ (individual man), the law forbids both to be of the same US written law.

The subject of Section 19706 is “Any person or any officer or employee of any corporation who.” As all officers and employees are persons, the subject of Section 19706 can be reduced to “Any person.”  The subject of Section 19706 is “Any person of any corporation.” They are the officers and employees of corporations who are duty-bound to do the acts required by law or refrain from committing acts prohibited by law.

The deception is in the ” Any person or any officer…”, where it appears to the untrained that the term ‘person’ is an ‘individual’ such as a ‘man’ (a man like you), when in fact in true context the statutory rule governs and that ‘person’ is not, can not be, a man, but can only be a ‘corporate person‘, as an officer of a corporation who has a legal duty to file or supply information to the state.

In order to make Section 19706 applicable to individuals with no association to any corporation, the phrase “any corporation,” would have to be removed.  Section 19706 only prescribes penalties for certain acts or omissions to act. As there is no law requiring an individual who fails or refuses to make a return, there is no obligation to make a State of California income tax return and, therefore, no income tax liability.  If your state imposes a personal income tax, it has a penalty statute similar to Section 19706. Find yours and send it to me for my analysis.

All 50 district ‘STATE of xxxx’, are governed the same. All participate in this fraud for billions of revenue dollars that they are not entitled to. If people stopped submitting state filings that make it appear that they are ‘persons’ statism control would come to a screeching halt, for no money no control. Then and only then would the people see the opportunity for self, and local community governance. Instead of contributing to ‘building colonies on Mars’ you can build them in your own community. Support your independent (of US) state as being one of the 50 states united.

Founders of America wrote in 1776, in the Declaration of Independence, that God says ‘man’ has unalienable Rights. Your property, your income, is not lien-able, not tax-take-able.

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera  (Once was a BAR licensed attorney.)

Note – US/United States is synonymous with ‘state’.

CONTACT – Paul Hansen through freeinhabitant.info, or pauljjhansenLAW@gmail.com. There is a simple process that you can utilize to challenge the IRS/US to prove that you are a taxable person without risk of prosecution upon your ceasing to file a U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, which eliminates any chance of intent as is required for any prosecution by the IRS/US. We can aid you with the ‘Request for a 26 USC 6203 Assessment’, with accompanying affidavit, by notary presentment, certified mailing by three participating notaries.

Case 89-2018-001

Google Form #15.00, 6-13-2018, 89-2018-001:

– As of 6-13-2018:

RE: This is a group communication for the Jurors in Case 89-2018-001.

– The following have not joined the chat room yet. > j5, j6, j7, j12.

– As of this date the following have joined this Chat. > Court Clerk-cc, Petitioner-P, j1, j2, j3, j4, j8, j9, j10, j11.

– This FORM #15.00 has been sent to all jurors and Petitioner by the IJSCCourt Clerk.

– Only A Few jurors have posted (any) substantial questions or responses.

– We understand that just because a juror is not making post does not mean they are not meticulously considering all post being made.

– This FORM #15.00 is being sent out due to prompting of several jurors.

– It may be necessary to offer to any jurors that do not wish to participate that they contact us by this FORM so that others may be added in their place.

– By answering all questions in this FORM the Court will be greatly helped in evaluating the level of participation of all jurors and if any additional steps are needed to provide a fair trial.

Questions for Jurors:

a. For aid you can read this link before proceeding with this questionnaire. > https://uberxo.com/2018/06/13/1500-form-info/

1. I have exercised due diligence in reading the Petitioners Claim?

2. I have been reading the Chat Room conversations consistently?

3. I have read all of the evidence and other documents provided in the Case Dropbox files?

4. I have joined the Chat Room and made comments or posted questions?

5. I do know how to join the Chat Room?

6. I have not joined the Chat Room but will soon?

7. I need help to join the Chat Room?

8. I wish to be removed from this case?

9. I wish for jurors to have a verbal or audio Chat Rooms available?

10. I am interested in a verbal, recorded (archived), Chat Room meeting once a week, starting at 6:00 pm CST (Central Standard Time) each Tuesday for any who wish to join? (Conference Number 712.451.0950, Pass-code 394266.) The proposed recorded Chat Room audio would be available for any person to review, at anytime, thereafter, vi. internet link. Starting on 6-19-2018. If no one is at the Chat Room at 5:55 > 6:05pm CST it will be assumed that no juror chat will take place that individual Tuesday. Any party of the case, or any juror, can offer to bring in additional people to provide impute in to any issue germane to the issues at hand. The majority jury vote has complete control of all activity of this case.

11. I will join this cases verbal Chat Room on 6-19-2018 at 6:00 CST?

Jury Biblical Oaths of Old:  (Most computers allow for enlarging for easier viewing.)

The below is for political offices but most believe that the Peoples courts have the same standard or greater.

Paul Severe Briefing:

CLICK > ‘HERE‘ > To go to PAUL SEVERE BRIEFING facebook page.

https://www.facebook.com/Paul-Severe-Briefing-413386029085878/

((Purpose of this post: 1. Chronological listing of all Severe’s briefs, w/additional links, w/ searchable topics capabilities. 2. To add general footnotes for all contact and viewing of all past post by Severe. See below – ‘General Foot Notes’.

 

General Foot Notes:

1. https://uberxo.com/2017/08/02/uberxo-compaulseverefacebookpostings/

 

 

 

>> 12.

101 Sales Tax, by honest Lawyer:

All ‘tax’ is a ‘use-tax’, all use tax is by ‘right’ a ‘property-right’, the US written laws cannot interfere with ‘property-rights’ (right to contract), for such is theft.

Applied-taxation is applied-contract.

If you wish to use my:

land, property, or time, I, and any state has right to charge a fee (tax) for such.

In America we have People, states, and states within a state (states are le·gal fic·tion, People are not.

The 50 union states are independent of the United States, The federal states [i]n the 50 states is land owned/en-trusted, by ‘The United States of America’ (the styled name for the Confederacy).

‘Land’ is space, ‘property’ is what lies within a space (land).

If you use my ‘land’ or my ‘property’, you pay me what tax I wish.

If I use your ‘land’ or your ‘property’, I pay you what tax you wish.

If any man uses any states land or state property, that man pays that state what tax it wishes.

Sales taxes are indirect (privilege use tax).

The US is forbidden to lay any indirect tax upon the People of the 50 states. (People of the 50 states are not ‘US citizens’, US citizen is a privileged status.)

The US is limited as to what indirect taxes it can lay upon US citizens.

Few people born on American land have elected to become a US citizen.

Only states can lay a Congressional-determined, apportioned-tax (direct-tax), upon People of the 50 states.

Flat-rate, indirect-tax, i.e. ‘sales-tax’, can be applied to acts ‘in’ land of the US, flat rate, direct-tax cannot be applied generally upon business ‘in’ land not owned by the US.

Art. 1, Sec. 8, Par. (17) identifies US land.

In Nevada it is hard to do business without the US for Nevada is 84% owned by the US, Connecticut is easy, only .4% is owned by the US.

Sales tax is constitutional in federal zones, sales tax is grossly UN-constitutionally applied in non-federal zones.

Lawyer Hansen, freeinhabitant.info.

>> END

 

 

Access to your RO, RW, Dropbox