Hansen Contact INFO: pauljjhansenlaw@gmail.com, 251-362-8231 Cell, one of my main sites > freeinhabitant.info.
SUPPORT – Proceeding from the 12/19/2025 Liveaboard meeting, many asked for means to support the creation of the “Formal Challenge/Brief 1” templates for anyone to make challenges upon those who claim governance authority. The below is the most economical ways to fund Lawyer Hansen:
>>>> Our Cash App account name is > $pjjh1493, best to locate it under my email > pauljjhansenlaw@gmail.com.
>>>> Our Venmo account name is >@paul-hansen-29118.
>>>> Our PayPal account name is same as my email > pauljjhansenlaw@gmail.com.
Caution – Many are contacting me asking if they should seek the aid of an attorney. Short answer {NO] need yet. remember your greatest offence and defense is your God given “right of man” as one of the People. When you enter into the BAR legal system you are never under right of man, or as one of the People. Attorneys have no representative authority with the/a People. The BAR is license to represent a “legal fiction” in a U.S. court, period. Legal fictions are not afforded the ‘Bill of Rights’. Oh foolish man, you give up your right under the protection of your People, for the false fatherly care, of what I call a demonic business, for profit, and power. Sadly most people are willing to pay the demon thousands when all he need do, generally, is to formally challenge authority.
I will be meeting with a small group of people Monday, the meetings will be audio recorded, and made available here, for all to review. 12/29/2025 6:00pm to 9:00pm, Red River Bar-B-Que & Grill -1911 E Main St Suite B, League City, TX. You must call Hansen to RSVP. >> Purpose of the meeting is to explain the imperative importance of how to keep the burden 100% on any person that believes they have authority to apply the League City Liveaboard Ordinance in the location where your boat is located at the time they confront you, regardless where. With little to no cost, little effort, and no risk.
All questioned ask of Lawyer Hansen, that are applicable to the subject matter, will be answered, and indexed, below, for now, for all to see.
Information Efficiency Defined – Thousands have the same question, one person asks, one “thorough” answer given, thousands thereafter have perpetual access to the ever improved/expanded answer, by this site, to that specific question.
>>>12/19/2025 Memorandum of Law:
The below RED (and/or in “Quotation Marks”) is text from the 2025 Ordinance.
Black letter is Paul John Hansen’s (freeinhabitant.info.com) comments, and directions. (Colored words do not follow these internet formats at times.)
2025 Ordinance – “, the City of League City is a home-rule municipality operating under Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution”…
City of League City is a legal entity that has ownership abilities, and therefore has proprietary right to governance, but only within the same limitations of the ‘The Constitution for the United States of America’, and its subdivision ‘STATE OF TEXAS’.
League City is limited exactly the same as the stated fathering (principal) entities, it cannot have more, yet it can be chartered to have less, if so designated, by written limitations, by its creator.
Just as the United States is generally limited to legislative (governance) authority to only land owned, (See Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the U.S. Constitution, known as the Enclave Clause, which grants Congress limited power to exercise exclusive legislation (law) over the federal district (DC) not exceeding ten miles square, becoming the seat of government, and over placespurchased with state consent for forts, arsenals, dock-yards, and other needful buildings (and lands), ensuring federal control over land owned “in” each independent 50 states united.
Being that all municipalities are creatures of states, and all states are creatures (legal entities that can sue, and be sued) of the ‘United States’, all are governed by the same said “constituted” written law.
You need not understand it, you need only formally challenge authority timely, and Hansen can aid you with this process at little to no cost.
>It is the first responsibility of all People to question authority, if not the People will lose all authority. < Biblical/Legal Maxim
More of the subject 2025 Ordinance >“and possesses full police powers of self-government to protect the public health, safety, sanitation, environmental quality, and general welfare, except where limited by state law; and….”
What I am showing you today, is the legal system, with the orchestrations by the AMRICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, and all those who lust for power, and hate any attempts made to communicate this limitation to the masses in America.
RULE NUMBER ONE – KEEP THE BURDEN ON THEM, never make any claims, force them on every trickery claim they make, and they likely will back off unless they have evidence of factual legislative/constitutional authority. If they proceed, after being formally challenged, as can be established in any official record, and they fail to evidence, yet proceed and cause injury, they (the acting individuals, under mere “color of law”) then they are ‘personally commercially liable’ for all damages. You can go after their houses, savings, pensions, etc., and they (actors without evidence of law) cannot even call upon city or state funding, for defense aid, it must come out of their own personal savings.
Most all that they do is true writtenconstitutionallaw, in essence, but most of it, at times, like this, is unconstitutionally applied, unintentionally. When formally noticed all that changes.
“Notice is paramount.” < Biblical/Legal Maxim
Prepared by – Lawyer Paul John Hansen
>>>P.S. – Email me your questions, and/or post in the Comments below, and I will try and provide the answers timely, herein, below:
INDEX:
AB
C – County – A client said that the city code enforcement said he is to apply the ordinances in “City of League City, in Galveston County, Texas”. The key word “county” is defined in ‘U.S. Statutes at Large’ therefore the ‘Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Const. requires the definition made by congress to be used in all U.S. courts, as a matter of law, which is >>U.S. Code › Title 1 › Chapter 1 ›§ – The word “county” includes a parish, or any other equivalent subdivision of a State or Territory of the United States. (July 30, 1947, ch. 388, 61 Stat. 633.). Every person that enters in to battle with the “city” will be labeled, on the official proceeding, generally falsely, as within the “county”, thus with only a surface evidence, of administrative authority, to apply said ordinance. Never state you are in, or not in anything, keep the burden on them, you never have to make an administrative legal determination, they must, when challenged formally. The same is true on most everything they rely upon. See freeinhabitant.info for more on the subject. All statutory ordinances are limited to the “principal” same limitations- U.S.>STATE OF TEXAS>GALVESTON COUNTY>CITY OF LEAGUE CITY, are all U.S. governed, and are independent of the authority of ‘the People of Texas. = “The People do not give up their sovereignty with the creation of entities,” reflects the principle of man’s sovereignty, the maxim that ultimate governing power remains with the People, even when delegating authority to governments or creating corporations. In the U.S., this means People (not citizens) retain control, as seen in the Brown Act requiring government transparency, and through constitutional rights ensuring the People stays informed to manage created entities like federal/state/city governments and even corporations, which derive their power from the People. While states joining supranational groups might cede some power, the fundamental idea is that People remain the source of authority, governed by the People’s common law, and not the U.S. courts.
DEFGHIJKL
M – Meeting/Liveaboard Law Discussion – several people wish to meet in the evening soon, to drill me (Lawyer Hansen) on strategy to challenge the ‘2025 Ordinance’ enforcement scope. I will audio record all questions and answers at this meeting and post it here, soon after. Text me (251-362-8231) if you believe that you may wish to attend, we will likely meet at Red River BBQ & Grill,1911 E. Main St. League City, TX 77573, at 12/29/2025, Monday, 6:00 to 9:00 pm, tentatively (Check this site for changes of date, time and location.) They have several meeting rooms that will work well for small, or larger groups. If one or twenty show, that will be fine with me, just bring your questions, and an appetite.
NO
P – PAPERS, Please – Questions what do I do when asked to present boat papers? I recommend to do the same as I do when pulled over on my boats, or in any automobile. I tell the one demanding, in a soft, kind voice, “officer after teaching law for 20-years I must say no thank your”. They usually then make another demand. Then I ask kindly; “can any thing I say, sign, or do here, be used against me criminally in a U.S. court”. They will say yes normally. Then I add “I wish to remain silent, per my right as one of the People, and the 5th Amendment, and I only wish to give you my name, DOB, and a mailing location for your immediate needs”. (They have common law right to the three said things, and they have the duty to evidence the remainder elements.) Several lawyers showed me the steps to challenge such safely by this simplified process. Simply put if you start giving them all the regular stuff, or talk about any more than the three things stated, they will receive it as prima facia evidence to continue to administrate over you, over the activity, and over the boat. I have legal packages for this for less than 25$, it is too complicated to make clear in a few paragraphs. See freeinhabitant.info, ‘right to travel’ for like applications. Understand, they must have evidence to make legal determinations, as to personal jurisdiction, authority to govern specific activity, [i]n only specific land, and such legal determinations cannot be shifted to you unless you consent.
Q
R – 12/20/2025 QUESTION – Can they (city, county, or state) make me register my boat if it is only in a slip? ANSWER > Registration/Boat Tags State and Federal Requirements – I will investigate, I assume it will be liken to vehicle requirements which are: 1. Applicable only in land owned by ‘The United States of America’. 2. Applies only to -18 U.S. Code § 31(6) Motor vehicle.— The term “motor vehicle” means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial (profit) purposes on the highways (Gov. owned land) in the transportation (a commercial term) of passengers, passengers and property, or property or cargo (notice it does not include recreational, or by right of man, People travel). 3. Keep Burden on the Claimant/Movant. There are so many variables, it makes little difference, the key is the person claiming authority must testify to his jurisdiction, (never, never, never you) if/when formally challenged. If/when they get it into the record formally (administratively), it must be challenged formally, if you want the imposed duty, or charges dismissed formally. What they do is always under presumption of contract. All relationships with the ‘United States’, and its subdivisions is by contract at their administrative statutory level. All US courts are not judicial, they are administrative/contract.
S – SEARCH – 12/25/2025 – WARRANT – You may be asked by a police officer, or code enforcement agent, to provide access to your boat, or for a boat you have control of for another person or entity, for a formal search, to assure compliance with some ordinance. Always say quietly, confidently, that my lawyer advised me to not give consent, unless a warrant is associated. And do no more talking regardless of what they ask. If they get pushy then say do you have probable cause to force any duty from me. Just act calm, with confidence like you are a federal judge, and they do not know it, and say you do not want your lawyer mad at you. All warrants must meet the minimum standards of the 4th Amendment, and that includes a sworn statement (formal affidavit) done in ones own personal commercial liability. If the affidavit lacks evidence ‘as a matter of law’ you sue for damages.
12/23/2025 The above is the document mailed to the City for land jurisdiction challenge purposes. Contact Hansen for Word Doc of the same for duplication for your own needs. pauljjhansenlaw@uberxo
>>>>
12/29/2025First – League City Email Reply to the above “FOIA”. City of League City, TX – Request for Public Information PIR-2025-1265: Clarification for redactions Inbox Melissa Chilcote (League City, TX) LeagueCityTX@request.justfoia.com 4:41 PM – Dear Requestor: HANSEN – The City of League City received your Application for Public Information. (PIR-2025-1265) The City received your request. To continue processing your request please respond to the questions below. Do you agree to the redaction of information that is subject to mandatory exceptions, provided such redactions are clearly labeled on the information you received? Do you agree to the redaction of information that is subject to discretionary exceptions, provided such redactions are clearly labeled on the information you receive? Please advise whether you authorize the City to redact the information. Upon receipt of your authorization, the City will process the documents accordingly. If we do not receive your response on or before 01/09/2026 we will forward the request to the Attorney General’s office for a ruling on the matter. Please feel free to contact me if you should have any questions. Thank you, City of League City, TX 300 West Walker Street League City, Texas 77573 PIR@leaguecitytx.gov (281)554-1030 League City, TX Please take a moment to complete our customer service survey. We appreciate your feedback!
>>>
12/29/2025 Hansen Replied Back by Email > Do you agree to the redaction of information that is subject to mandatory exceptions, provided such redactions are clearly labeled on the information you received? No, I do not agree. I wish for all the information I have right to as one of the People of Texas.
City asks > Do you agree to the redaction of information that is subject to discretionary exceptions, provided such redactions are clearly labeled on the information you receive? Hansen Replies No, I do not agree. I wish for all the information I have right to as one of the People of Texas.
>>>>
12/30/2025 City asks for more information > Dear Requestor: For the City to continue to process your request for records, we require additional information. Please provide the following: {Can you provide a specific time frame for this request?} Please send a written response or clarification to the City in a timely manner. If a response is not received by the 61st day from today’s date {02/27/2026} this request will be considered withdrawn. Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions. Thank you
Hansen Reply > I am confused as to your need as to/for time frame, The primary need of Hansen is evidence if the Article V, “Vessel Residency and Nuisance Vessel Abatement” to Chapter 70 of the League City Code of Ordinances, has ‘force and effect of law’ only [i]n land that is land owned by League City, Texas, as officially incorporated in 1962, or does it have ‘force and effect of law’ in land that is not owned by the said League City, Texas, in the Peoples land called Texas?
